<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tiffany B. Brown &#187; print journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tiffanybbrown.com/tag/print-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com</link>
	<description>A web log about web development and internet culture with frequent detours into other stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:35:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is writing a headline for a t-shirt wrong?</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/01/22/is-writing-a-headline-for-a-t-shirt-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/01/22/is-writing-a-headline-for-a-t-shirt-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tiffany</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnn.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headline writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/?p=1752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: I probably should have included a note of caution that this image could be a fake. I don&#8217;t know if this headline actually appeared on CNN.com and was later removed or if it&#8217;s a PhotoShop job. I ask this question after seeing the screen grab (posted above) of this headline from CNN.com (posted on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="editors-note">
<strong>UPDATE:</strong> I probably should have included a note of caution that this image could be a fake. I don&#8217;t know if this headline actually appeared on CNN.com and was later removed or if it&#8217;s a PhotoShop job.
</p>
<p><a href="http://tiffanybbrown.com/images/uploads/2009/01/obamas_juggle_inaugural_balls.jpg"><img src="http://tiffanybbrown.com/images/uploads/2009/01/obamas_juggle_inaugural_balls-300x291.jpg" alt="obamas_juggle_inaugural_balls" title="obamas_juggle_inaugural_balls" width="300" height="291" class="imgright rightimg" /></a></p>
<p>I ask this question after seeing the screen grab (posted above) of this headline from CNN.com (<a href="http://friendfeed.com/e/29ee98ff-ef1a-4f07-b018-d06c98d95568/C-mon-CNN-you-can-do-better-than-that/">posted on Friendfeed</a>). </p>
<p>That headline is a rare triple-entendre. There&#8217;s the first meaning: &#8220;juggling balls&#8221; as in &#8220;attending ten inaugural balls.&#8221; There&#8217;s the second reading: &#8220;juggling balls&#8221; as in &#8220;throwing <em>actual</em> balls in the air.&#8221; Then there&#8217;s the pubescent child&#8217;s reading: &#8220;balls&#8221; as in &#8220;testicles.&#8221; </p>
<p>I found it giggle-worthy and kind of brilliant, precisely because of its three ways of word play. Then I took a closer at the screen shot. See that little t-shirt icon to the right? Yep. This headline was also available on a t-shirt.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t a new feature for CNN.com. Headline t-shirts have been available since last spring. One of my coworkers, a CNN.com alumnus, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nate/3006126168/">purchased one last fall</a>.  I bought one myself after Obama&#8217;s election victory.</p>
<p>But that particular headline made me wonder: <strong>Are CNN.com&#8217;s headline writers trying to write t-shirt worthy headlines? And if so is that a bad thing?</strong></p>
<p>Before I continue, I must add this disclaimer: I AM NOT SAYING THAT CNN.com EDITORS TRY TO WRITE T-SHIRT-WORTHY HEADLINES. I DO NOT KNOW HOW OR WHY SOME HEADLINES ARE CHOSEN AS T-SHIRT OPTIONS, though I certainly would like to. Surprisingly, this is not a <a href=" http://www.cnn.com/tshirt/faq/">frequently asked question</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll also add that when I checked <a href="http://www.cnn.com/tshirt/">CNN&#8217;s headline t-shirt store</a>, this headline was no longer for sale. </p>
<p>People being people, however, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if headline writers didn&#8217;t think &#8212; at least some times &#8212; &#8220;Oh man, this would be teh awesome on a t-shirt!&#8221; I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a bad thing.</p>
<p>The point of a good headline, after all, is to <em>sell the story</em>. &#8220;Sell&#8221; in this sense usually means &#8220;entice to read or click.&#8221; But good headlines &#8212; and by &#8220;good&#8221; I mean &#8220;appropriate in tone, reflective of the story, and either emotionally moving, clever, witty, or humorous&#8221; &#8212; also have the less obvious goal of selling papers and generating ad impressions. </p>
<p>Though sales (of ads and of copies) in the literal sense may not be top of mind for headline writers, I think it&#8217;s less than honest to say that &#8220;selling&#8221; of some kind isn&#8217;t a consideration. That&#8217;s precisely why I think it&#8217;s okay if the folks at CNN.com strive to write t-shirt worthy headlines. </p>
<p>Web site editors will often write or rewrite headlines to generate page views from readers and search engines. In the online world, good headlines = more page views.  More page views = more revenue.  Selling headlines on t-shirts just removes a step and makes for a shorter equation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/01/22/is-writing-a-headline-for-a-t-shirt-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

