<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tiffany B. Brown &#187; fonts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tiffanybbrown.com/tag/fonts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com</link>
	<description>A web log about web development and internet culture with frequent detours into other stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:23:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>@font-face and WOFF round up</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/11/02/font-face-and-woff/</link>
		<comments>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/11/02/font-face-and-woff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tiffany</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[font-face]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/?p=2318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web fonts took a big step closer to reality last month with a few announcements regarding the Web Open Font Format or WOFF. A big hurdle to the implementation @font-face and font linking has been a two-fold issue of licensing: Not all fonts are licensed for embedding and linking on the web. Major browser developers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web fonts took a big step closer to reality last month with a few announcements regarding the <a href="http://people.mozilla.com/~jkew/woff/woff-spec-latest.html" class="ext">Web Open Font Format</a> or WOFF. A big hurdle to the implementation <code>@font-face</code> and font linking has been a two-fold issue of licensing:</p>
<ol>
<li>Not all fonts are licensed for embedding and linking on the web.</li>
<li>Major browser developers have differing philosophies about <em>where</em> the responsibility for license compliance should fall.</li>
</ol>
<p>Microsoft, for example, has not implemented <code>@font-face</code>, in part, because it believes in protecting type foundries from the potential intellectual property violations of embedded fonts.<sup><a href="#n20091102a">*</a></sup> Opera, Safari / WebKit, and Mozilla leave compliance to the developer and support <code>@font-face</code> property. </p>
<p>In late May, a <a href="http://blog.typekit.com/2009/05/27/introducing-typekit/">Typekit</a> private beta launch brought the issue of embedded fonts and licensing back to the forefront. Typekit is a hosted font service that allows developers to select from a library of type chosen and hosted by Typekit and licensed for the web. </p>
<p>Ars Technica speculated about the future of web typography in its July article, <a href="http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/07/font-face-typekit-and-font-licensing-the-state-of-web-type.ars" class="blogpost title">The hazy future of Web typography</a>.</p>
<p>Late last month (October, 2009), type foundry <a href="http://www.houseind.com/showandtell/2009/10/20/FontsontheWeb">House Industries</a> announced its support for <abbr title="Web Open Font Format">WOFF</abbr>, stating that the format <q>satisfies the needs and concerns of browser makers, web designers, and type foundries, [and] offers compression to speed page load times, freedom from thorny legacy issues, and inclusiveness (font outlines can be Postscript or TrueType).</q></p>
<p>That same day, Mozilla <a href="http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/10/woff/">announced</a> that <abbr title="Web Open Font Format">WOFF</abbr> support would be available in Firefox 3.6.</p>
<p>Today (November 2, 2009) Ars Technica features an article with <a href="http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/11/web-open-font-format-backed-by-mozilla-type-foundries.ars">more background</a> on last month&#8217;s announcements.</p>
<h3>More about embedded web fonts</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2009/10/30/firefox-3-6-beta-1-is-now-available-for-download/">Firefox 3.6 Beta 1 is now available for download</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.zeldman.com/2009/10/31/house-party/">House Party</a> (Zeldman&#8217;s round up)</li>
<li><a href="http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/10/font-control-for-designers/">after Firefox 3.6 – new font control features for designers</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2009/10/20/mozilla-supports-web-open-font-format/">Mozilla Supports Web Open Font Format</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.edenspiekermann.com/woff/">Typographic diversity for the web</a></li>
<li><a href="http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/seven-web-fonts-showcases/">Seven Web Fonts showcases</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/cssatten">CSS @ Ten: The Next Big Thing</a></li>
<li><a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2008/10/embedded-web-fonts.ars">An introduction to W3C Web Fonts</a></li>
</ul>
<p class="footnote" id="n20091102a">* <a href="http://cwilso.com/">Chris Wilson</a> and <a href="http://adactio.com/" class="ext">Jeremy Keith</a> had a rather heated debate about this subject at 2009&#8242;s South by Southwest &#8220;Browser Wars&#8221; panel. Chris Wilson, who was a part of the Internet Explorer development team at the time, made essentially this argument. Microsoft does, however, have its <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/typography/web/embedding/">own format</a> for embedding fonts on the web</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/11/02/font-face-and-woff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

