<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tiffany B. Brown &#187; continuous partial attention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tiffanybbrown.com/tag/continuous-partial-attention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com</link>
	<description>A web log about web development and internet culture with frequent detours into other stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:35:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>danah boyd on limited attention and information streams</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/11/18/danah-boyd-on-limited-attention-and-information-streams/</link>
		<comments>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/11/18/danah-boyd-on-limited-attention-and-information-streams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tiffany</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Information management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuous partial attention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danah boyd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited attention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/?p=2623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[boyd posted notes from her Web2.0 talk, &#8220;Streams of Content, Limited Attention: The Flow of Information through Social Media&#8221; As networked technologies proliferate around the world, we can assume that there is a channel of distribution available to everyone and between everyone. In theory, anyone could get content to anyone else. With the barriers to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>boyd posted notes from her Web2.0 talk, &#8220;<a href="http://www.danah.org/papers/talks/Web2Expo.html">Streams of Content, Limited Attention: The Flow of Information through Social Media</a>&#8221; </p>
<blockquote><p>As networked technologies proliferate around the world, we can assume that there is a channel of distribution available to everyone and between everyone. In theory, anyone could get content to anyone else. With the barriers to distribution collapsing, what matters is not the act of distribution, but the act of consumption. Thus, the power is no longer in the hands of those who control the channels of distribution, but those who control the limited resource of attention. This is precisely why YOU were the Person of the Year. Your attention is precious and valuable. It&#8217;s no longer about push; it&#8217;s about pull. And the law of two feet is now culturally pervasive. </p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, we know that and live that, right? But danah explains why and how this current Web2.0 wave is different from the early adopter wave/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/11/18/danah-boyd-on-limited-attention-and-information-streams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Continuous partial attention&#8221; and &#8220;email apnea&#8221; from the CBC&#8217;s &#8220;Spark&#8221; podcast</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/11/08/continuous-partial-attention-and-email-apnea/</link>
		<comments>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/11/08/continuous-partial-attention-and-email-apnea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tiffany</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Information management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuous partial attention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email apnea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information overload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linda stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spark podcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/?p=2417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CBC&#8217;s Spark podcast is one of my regular listens. One recent episode featured an interview with Linda Stone, a longtime tech thought leader. She coined the term continuous partial attention, to describe our new way of multi-tasking and always-on communications. Now Stone has coined a new phrase: e-mail apnea. Stone first described e-mail apnea [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CBC&#8217;s <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/spark/" class="ext">Spark</a> podcast is one of my regular listens. One <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/spark/2009/10/spark-90-november-1-3-2009/" class="ext">recent episode</a> featured an interview with <a href="http://www.lindastone.net/">Linda Stone</a>, a longtime tech thought leader. She coined the term <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_Partial_Attention" class="ext">continuous partial attention</a>, to describe our new way of multi-tasking and always-on communications.</p>
<p>Now Stone has coined a new phrase: e-mail apnea. Stone first described e-mail apnea in a 2008 Huffington Post piece <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/linda-stone/just-breathe-building-the_b_85651.html" class="ext">Just Breathe: Building the case for Email Apnea</a>. Stone says e-mail apnea is <q>a temporary absence or suspension of breathing, or shallow breathing, while doing email</q>. From the piece:</p>
<blockquote><p>I wanted to know &#8211; how widespread is &#8220;email apnea?&#8221; I observed others on computers and Blackberries: in their offices, their homes, at cafes &#8212; the vast majority of people held their breath, or breathed very shallowly, especially when responding to email. I watched people on cell phones, talking and walking, and noticed that most were mouth-breathing and hyperventilating. Consider also, that for many, posture while seated at a computer can contribute to restricted breathing.</p></blockquote>
<p>According to Stone, our tendency to get emotionally anxious and hunch our shoulders and chest while in front of a screen has long-term physical consequences. Such a posture means we are engaging in shallow breathing, thereby triggering our fight or flight mechanisms. We&#8217;re in a constant state of low grade stress. As she asks in the HuffPo piece: <q>Now I want to know: Is it only the Big Mac that makes us fat? Or, are we more obese and diabetic because of a combination of holding our breath off and on all day and then failing to move when our bodies have prepared us to do so?</q></p>
<p>In the Spark interview, Stone also talks about current and future technology-centric solutions that could change our behavior. How, for example, might office spaces be constructed to encourage stretching and movement. Might we have standing computer stations? Stone also cites the Wii Fit and the Toyota Prius dash display as gentle electronic nudges that encourage people to do things differently. </p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/spark/2009/10/spark-90-november-1-3-2009/" class="ext">entire episode</a> is worth a listen. The first half of the show is an interview with Alain de Botton about the joys and sorrows of work. But skip to about 26:54 to hear the start of the interview with Linda Stone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2009/11/08/continuous-partial-attention-and-email-apnea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

