A Lost Decade in the Making
But the Great Recession was different: It was triggered by a financial meltdown brought on by excessive lending, reckless risk taking, the implosion of an unregulated shadow banking system that assumed that short-term money would always be available — and ignorant and careless borrowing by people and institutions.
The key paragraph from Who can magically fix the economy? No one in Fortune.
This is why I am not upset with Obama for his handling of the economy. Bankers, financiers, crazy asset value-to-price ratios, and debt is what brought us here. Resetting asset valuations and becoming debt-free is what will get us out.
In a consumer spending-driven economy, I think there are only two ways to get out quickly. You either need to:
- Create jobs; or
- Forgive credit card debts and write down mortgage principal so that people have more room in their budgets to spend and invest, even if they have less income.
Notice my emphasis on or. But since neither of those things are going to happen,* we’ll have to:
- Wait until people pay debts down or off;
- Wait until those folks’ credit clears up and they become a low-risk borrower; and
- Wait until banks are steady enough to lend again while also hoping that everyone else is both patient enough and able to ride out their underwater mortgages, pay their credit card debts, and keep their businesses afloat.
Notice my emphasis on and. In a best-case scenario, I think we will be in this ultra-low growth pattern for 8-12 more years. See: Japan.
Get used to it.
* Analysts keep insisting there’s a “moral hazard” in forgiving debts or in principal write-downs. And I might agree if we were talking about a single borrower. But we’re talking about an entire economy that was killed by an asset bubble. Many people are so far underwater that it will take more time to get even on their mortgage than it will for their credit to recover from a foreclosure or short sale. Let’s look at this another way: is it moral that we ask people to jeopardize their ability to build a nest-egg because they’ll have negative equity for the next 25 years? Would you take that risk?