<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Hillary 1984&#8217; and what might it all mean?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tiffanybbrown.com/2007/03/20/hillary-1984-and-what-might-it-all-mean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2007/03/20/hillary-1984-and-what-might-it-all-mean/</link>
	<description>A web log about web development and internet culture with frequent detours into other stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2007/03/20/hillary-1984-and-what-might-it-all-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-42387</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/2007/03/20/hillary-1984-and-what-might-it-all-mean/#comment-42387</guid>
		<description>I saw this out at the OMMA (online media, marketing &amp; advertising) conference in Hollywood last week. It was presented as an advertising and marketing tactic/how-tos.  I don&#039;t think many people saw this, prior to that event.  I have shown it to some of my coworkers  and they have no-clue.  

The messenger obviously is trying to give us the perspective that Mrs. Clinton is infringing on our right to speak, and live independently. This may impact Hilary&#039;s candidacy for the worst. YaY! for Obama.

However, interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this out at the OMMA (online media, marketing &amp; advertising) conference in Hollywood last week. It was presented as an advertising and marketing tactic/how-tos.  I don&#8217;t think many people saw this, prior to that event.  I have shown it to some of my coworkers  and they have no-clue.  </p>
<p>The messenger obviously is trying to give us the perspective that Mrs. Clinton is infringing on our right to speak, and live independently. This may impact Hilary&#8217;s candidacy for the worst. YaY! for Obama.</p>
<p>However, interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2007/03/20/hillary-1984-and-what-might-it-all-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-92812</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/2007/03/20/hillary-1984-and-what-might-it-all-mean/#comment-92812</guid>
		<description>I saw this out at the OMMA (online media, marketing &amp; advertising) conference in Hollywood last week. It was presented as an advertising and marketing tactic/how-tos.  I don&#039;t think many people saw this, prior to that event.  I have shown it to some of my coworkers  and they have no-clue.  

The messenger obviously is trying to give us the perspective that Mrs. Clinton is infringing on our right to speak, and live independently. This may impact Hilary&#039;s candidacy for the worst. YaY! for Obama.

However, interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this out at the OMMA (online media, marketing &amp; advertising) conference in Hollywood last week. It was presented as an advertising and marketing tactic/how-tos.  I don&#8217;t think many people saw this, prior to that event.  I have shown it to some of my coworkers  and they have no-clue.  </p>
<p>The messenger obviously is trying to give us the perspective that Mrs. Clinton is infringing on our right to speak, and live independently. This may impact Hilary&#8217;s candidacy for the worst. YaY! for Obama.</p>
<p>However, interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

