<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open source favorites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tiffanybbrown.com/2006/05/30/open-source-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2006/05/30/open-source-software/</link>
	<description>A web log about web development and internet culture with frequent detours into other stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiffany</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2006/05/30/open-source-software/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>tiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/viewqb.php/613#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Thanks AG, I figured there was a module somewhere. But WP does it out of the box. 

You can do collaboration to a degree with WP and MT. But I agree that Drupal was designed to be a collaboration tool first, while WP and MT were designed to blogging tools with collaboration features.

It really depends on what your needs are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks AG, I figured there was a module somewhere. But WP does it out of the box. </p>
<p>You can do collaboration to a degree with WP and MT. But I agree that Drupal was designed to be a collaboration tool first, while WP and MT were designed to blogging tools with collaboration features.</p>
<p>It really depends on what your needs are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiffany</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2006/05/30/open-source-software/comment-page-1/#comment-92441</link>
		<dc:creator>tiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/viewqb.php/613#comment-92441</guid>
		<description>Thanks AG, I figured there was a module somewhere. But WP does it out of the box. 

You can do collaboration to a degree with WP and MT. But I agree that Drupal was designed to be a collaboration tool first, while WP and MT were designed to blogging tools with collaboration features.

It really depends on what your needs are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks AG, I figured there was a module somewhere. But WP does it out of the box. </p>
<p>You can do collaboration to a degree with WP and MT. But I agree that Drupal was designed to be a collaboration tool first, while WP and MT were designed to blogging tools with collaboration features.</p>
<p>It really depends on what your needs are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AG</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2006/05/30/open-source-software/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>AG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/viewqb.php/613#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Hmm... Regarding Drupal, I do agree that it has a fair amount of complexity, as it was not designed to _only_ be a blogging publishing engine. It is a quite simply a collaboration tool. If you only want a blogging publishing engine, go get MT or WP. I wouldn&#039;t consider MT or WP to be turn-key collaboration tools. So Drupal vs. WP is like comparing sheep and moose ;)

That said, it is uber powerful and it _does_ handle path aliasing when you use the appropriate modules. Actually, I found an excellent Drupal &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lullabot.com/files/Drupal-4.7-Menu-System.mov&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;videocast&lt;/a&gt; for newbies. That site is chock full info on all things Drupal. 

Heh, FOSS favorites.. There are many,but I&#039;ll only bless you with a few. The last two are Java apps, so they&#039;re really not &#039;free&#039; as in free speech. 

Ekiga - SIP phone and much more
Evolution - email client
Gnucash - Personal finance tool
amaroK - Music application rivals iTunes
Beagle - Desktop indexing application
azureus - P2P BitTorrent application
Limewire - P2P Gnutella network application</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; Regarding Drupal, I do agree that it has a fair amount of complexity, as it was not designed to _only_ be a blogging publishing engine. It is a quite simply a collaboration tool. If you only want a blogging publishing engine, go get MT or WP. I wouldn&#8217;t consider MT or WP to be turn-key collaboration tools. So Drupal vs. WP is like comparing sheep and moose <img src='http://tiffanybbrown.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>That said, it is uber powerful and it _does_ handle path aliasing when you use the appropriate modules. Actually, I found an excellent Drupal <a href="http://www.lullabot.com/files/Drupal-4.7-Menu-System.mov" rel="nofollow">videocast</a> for newbies. That site is chock full info on all things Drupal. </p>
<p>Heh, FOSS favorites.. There are many,but I&#8217;ll only bless you with a few. The last two are Java apps, so they&#8217;re really not &#8216;free&#8217; as in free speech. </p>
<p>Ekiga &#8211; SIP phone and much more<br />
Evolution &#8211; email client<br />
Gnucash &#8211; Personal finance tool<br />
amaroK &#8211; Music application rivals iTunes<br />
Beagle &#8211; Desktop indexing application<br />
azureus &#8211; P2P BitTorrent application<br />
Limewire &#8211; P2P Gnutella network application</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AG</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2006/05/30/open-source-software/comment-page-1/#comment-92440</link>
		<dc:creator>AG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/viewqb.php/613#comment-92440</guid>
		<description>Hmm... Regarding Drupal, I do agree that it has a fair amount of complexity, as it was not designed to _only_ be a blogging publishing engine. It is a quite simply a collaboration tool. If you only want a blogging publishing engine, go get MT or WP. I wouldn&#039;t consider MT or WP to be turn-key collaboration tools. So Drupal vs. WP is like comparing sheep and moose ;)

That said, it is uber powerful and it _does_ handle path aliasing when you use the appropriate modules. Actually, I found an excellent Drupal &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lullabot.com/files/Drupal-4.7-Menu-System.mov&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;videocast&lt;/a&gt; for newbies. That site is chock full info on all things Drupal. 

Heh, FOSS favorites.. There are many,but I&#039;ll only bless you with a few. The last two are Java apps, so they&#039;re really not &#039;free&#039; as in free speech. 

Ekiga - SIP phone and much more
Evolution - email client
Gnucash - Personal finance tool
amaroK - Music application rivals iTunes
Beagle - Desktop indexing application
azureus - P2P BitTorrent application
Limewire - P2P Gnutella network application</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; Regarding Drupal, I do agree that it has a fair amount of complexity, as it was not designed to _only_ be a blogging publishing engine. It is a quite simply a collaboration tool. If you only want a blogging publishing engine, go get MT or WP. I wouldn&#8217;t consider MT or WP to be turn-key collaboration tools. So Drupal vs. WP is like comparing sheep and moose <img src='http://tiffanybbrown.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>That said, it is uber powerful and it _does_ handle path aliasing when you use the appropriate modules. Actually, I found an excellent Drupal <a href="http://www.lullabot.com/files/Drupal-4.7-Menu-System.mov" rel="nofollow">videocast</a> for newbies. That site is chock full info on all things Drupal. </p>
<p>Heh, FOSS favorites.. There are many,but I&#8217;ll only bless you with a few. The last two are Java apps, so they&#8217;re really not &#8216;free&#8217; as in free speech. </p>
<p>Ekiga &#8211; SIP phone and much more<br />
Evolution &#8211; email client<br />
Gnucash &#8211; Personal finance tool<br />
amaroK &#8211; Music application rivals iTunes<br />
Beagle &#8211; Desktop indexing application<br />
azureus &#8211; P2P BitTorrent application<br />
Limewire &#8211; P2P Gnutella network application</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiffany</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2006/05/30/open-source-software/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>tiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 02:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/viewqb.php/613#comment-156</guid>
		<description>I like WordPress&#039;s ease of configuration. It&#039;s very easy to get up and running, and very easy to create your own theme. Think of WordPress as a blogging package that can be massaged into a CMS.

Drupal is too big a package for just blogging. It&#039;s very full-featured, and very good for sites with lots of content or that need a workflow. Think of Drupal as a CMS that can be massaged into blogging software. And it&#039;s much, much harder to develop themes for Drupal. I can launch a custom-designed WP site in a weekend. I can&#039;t say that about Drupal.

WP also supports clean URLs. I&#039;m using funky numeric URLs here to preserve my existing URL structure. But with WordPress you can have URLs such as &#039;http://domainname.com/this-is-the-post-name&#039; instead of the &#039;http://domainname.com/node/234&#039; URLs you get with Drupal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like WordPress&#8217;s ease of configuration. It&#8217;s very easy to get up and running, and very easy to create your own theme. Think of WordPress as a blogging package that can be massaged into a CMS.</p>
<p>Drupal is too big a package for just blogging. It&#8217;s very full-featured, and very good for sites with lots of content or that need a workflow. Think of Drupal as a CMS that can be massaged into blogging software. And it&#8217;s much, much harder to develop themes for Drupal. I can launch a custom-designed WP site in a weekend. I can&#8217;t say that about Drupal.</p>
<p>WP also supports clean URLs. I&#8217;m using funky numeric URLs here to preserve my existing URL structure. But with WordPress you can have URLs such as &#8216;<a href="http://domainname.com/this-is-the-post-name" rel="nofollow">http://domainname.com/this-is-the-post-name</a>&#8216; instead of the &#8216;<a href="http://domainname.com/node/234" rel="nofollow">http://domainname.com/node/234</a>&#8216; URLs you get with Drupal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiffany</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2006/05/30/open-source-software/comment-page-1/#comment-92439</link>
		<dc:creator>tiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/viewqb.php/613#comment-92439</guid>
		<description>I like WordPress&#039;s ease of configuration. It&#039;s very easy to get up and running, and very easy to create your own theme. Think of WordPress as a blogging package that can be massaged into a CMS.

Drupal is too big a package for just blogging. It&#039;s very full-featured, and very good for sites with lots of content or that need a workflow. Think of Drupal as a CMS that can be massaged into blogging software. And it&#039;s much, much harder to develop themes for Drupal. I can launch a custom-designed WP site in a weekend. I can&#039;t say that about Drupal.

WP also supports clean URLs. I&#039;m using funky numeric URLs here to preserve my existing URL structure. But with WordPress you can have URLs such as &#039;http://domainname.com/this-is-the-post-name&#039; instead of the &#039;http://domainname.com/node/234&#039; URLs you get with Drupal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like WordPress&#8217;s ease of configuration. It&#8217;s very easy to get up and running, and very easy to create your own theme. Think of WordPress as a blogging package that can be massaged into a CMS.</p>
<p>Drupal is too big a package for just blogging. It&#8217;s very full-featured, and very good for sites with lots of content or that need a workflow. Think of Drupal as a CMS that can be massaged into blogging software. And it&#8217;s much, much harder to develop themes for Drupal. I can launch a custom-designed WP site in a weekend. I can&#8217;t say that about Drupal.</p>
<p>WP also supports clean URLs. I&#8217;m using funky numeric URLs here to preserve my existing URL structure. But with WordPress you can have URLs such as &#8216;<a href="http://domainname.com/this-is-the-post-name" rel="nofollow">http://domainname.com/this-is-the-post-name</a>&#8216; instead of the &#8216;<a href="http://domainname.com/node/234" rel="nofollow">http://domainname.com/node/234</a>&#8216; URLs you get with Drupal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2006/05/30/open-source-software/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 02:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/viewqb.php/613#comment-155</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s your thought on Drupal vs Wordpress ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s your thought on Drupal vs WordPress ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2006/05/30/open-source-software/comment-page-1/#comment-92438</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/viewqb.php/613#comment-92438</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s your thought on Drupal vs Wordpress ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s your thought on Drupal vs WordPress ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rashid Z. Muhammad</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2006/05/30/open-source-software/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashid Z. Muhammad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 22:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/viewqb.php/613#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Firefox, OOo, Filezilla, and PuTTY are all essential for sure.

A few more:

CDEX - CD Ripper
CVS - Source Control
Ethereal - Network Protocol Analyzer
Apache + Tomcat / PHP / Mono / JBoss - App server</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox, OOo, Filezilla, and PuTTY are all essential for sure.</p>
<p>A few more:</p>
<p>CDEX &#8211; CD Ripper<br />
CVS &#8211; Source Control<br />
Ethereal &#8211; Network Protocol Analyzer<br />
Apache + Tomcat / PHP / Mono / JBoss &#8211; App server</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rashid Z. Muhammad</title>
		<link>http://tiffanybbrown.com/2006/05/30/open-source-software/comment-page-1/#comment-92437</link>
		<dc:creator>Rashid Z. Muhammad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiffanybbrown.com/viewqb.php/613#comment-92437</guid>
		<description>Firefox, OOo, Filezilla, and PuTTY are all essential for sure.

A few more:

CDEX - CD Ripper
CVS - Source Control
Ethereal - Network Protocol Analyzer
Apache + Tomcat / PHP / Mono / JBoss - App server</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox, OOo, Filezilla, and PuTTY are all essential for sure.</p>
<p>A few more:</p>
<p>CDEX &#8211; CD Ripper<br />
CVS &#8211; Source Control<br />
Ethereal &#8211; Network Protocol Analyzer<br />
Apache + Tomcat / PHP / Mono / JBoss &#8211; App server</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

